THE
ROMANCE OF THE GEAR
Aircrew
Head Protection in the Jet Age:
(Collecting
Flight Helmets as Militaria)
by
Christopher T. Carey
Who,
among aviation buffs and action fans alike the world over, could ever forget the
exciting scenes of fighter jock icy-calm bravado as pilots repeatedly pushed the
aircraft combat performance envelope to the limits in such classic movies as
‘TOP GUN’ and ‘THE RIGHT STUFF?’ It took a pretty beat libido and low
testosterone titer to sit there and watch those stirring adventures in the wild
blue yonder without feeling a distinct thrill shoot down the spine like a
Sidewinder missile.
Today,
one of the most interesting means these legions of armchair fighter jocks have
at their disposal to expiate unrequited yearnings of this sort is to collect
aircrew protective flight gear (now known to professionals as ‘Aircrew Life
Support Equipment’). Perhaps you can’t actually walk the walk and talk the
talk of the righteous brotherhood of Sierra
Hotel military pilots but you can certainly pursue the fascinating hobby
of surrounding yourself with the tools of their trade, and in so doing,
vicariously bask somewhat in the reflected glory of their calling.
Of
all the ‘tools’ used by the military pilot, perhaps the most glamorous of
them all (to the wannabe Tom Cruise) is the pilot’s flight helmet. Just as in
the medieval era, when a knight’s ornately decorated helmet summarily
symbolized all of those chivalrous qualities that ennobled him as a fearless
fighting man, the protective helmet an aviator or aircrewman wears visibly sums
him up as a card-carrying member of this elite fraternity of military fliers.
Each flight helmet visually tells a unique story about the special requirements
for pilot safety and protection modern high-performance military aviation has
demanded over the years, as the technology of military aviation has continued to
advance in quantum leaps. Additionally, personalised color schemes and
decorations may also serve to further differentiate various specimens as unique
examples of their type.
SOME
EARLY AIRCREW PROTECTIVE HELMET HISTORY:
Today,
100 years since the first powered, controlled heavier-than-air flight took
place, the advances in aircrew protective equipment span such a great broad
range that for reasons of convenience and necessity, life support historians and
buffs generally recognize two principal categories: 1) the era of
propeller-driven flight (from about 1900 through 1945), and 2) the era
of jet turbine and rocket flight (from 1945 onwards, with some necessary overlap
of the two periods). It is fairly easy to see, in examining flight headgear from
the earliest days of flight through the present, that it has been largely the
increasing challenge to pilot safety in terms of the raw physics of flight
encountered that has dictated the form and substance of latter-era protective
headgear.
In
the early years of the 1900s through the end of the Second World War, the
aviator’s helmet was invariably made of soft (frequently insulated) leather
and was intended purely to protect him from the effects of wind and cold. As
advances in wireless radio communications developed, the basic leather helmet
began to feature earphones for radio receiver headsets; still later, as
turbocharging technology permitted higher aircraft operating altitudes, oxygen
delivery devices became standard as well. Early eye protection in the form of
rubber-framed glass goggles were adopted virtually from the fledgling days of
manned flight as the most reasonable way to protect the eyes, especially in the
old open-cockpit machines. This yielded out of necessity, as operating speeds
became substantially increased (in jet aircraft), to more substantial, rigid
visors intended to protect aircrew from the potentially deadly wind-blast
effects of emergency ejection from a disabled aircraft.
Although
the crash forces encountered in the early days of aviation were in a sense just
as deadly as those created by far more modern high-performance aircraft, little
thought was initially given to providing a pilot’s head with added crash
protection in the form of semi-rigid shells. Partly this was the result of
insufficient materials technology advanced enough for use in headgear protection
designs, but nevertheless one regularly finds the occasional concerted attempt
to provide sturdier, reinforced head protection for pilots in aviation’s
earlier years. A handful of such designs (one French, another Italian, several
German) originating in Europe (and many more from other nations including the
USA), surfaced in the first two decades of powered flight, consisting mostly of
thickly padded and leather reinforced sections added to the upper hemisphere of
a conventional soft leather helmet. Further examples are discovered from time to
time in studies of flight protection in these early years. In the 30s and 40s,
German glider pilot students, for example, sometimes wore substantially
reinforced, aluminum-shelled helmets as crash protection in their lightweight
sailplanes of the 30s.
In
the Second World War, successive advances in science and technology brought on
by war research resulted in the development of RAF scientist Frank Whittle’s
pioneering axial-flow turbojet engine in the West and in concurrent radial flow
designs produced in Germany. Ironically, in the United States, the need for
sturdier protective aircrew helmets had been initially investigated by no less
distinguished an investigator than American aviation medicine's highly respected
high-altitude researcher Dr. Harry G. Armstrong (in 1938), but were
somewhat ironically found 'unnecessary' by this early pioneer of modern
aerospace medicine.
However,
with the higher speeds permitted by jet engine powered aircraft, more thought
began to be given to sparing the pilot from the potential hazards resulting from
the substantially increased inertial forces encountered in high-speed jet
turbine powered flight. Just before the war ended, for instance, German
aeronautical laboratories at Rechlin had investigated a protective helmet design
that drew heavily upon then-existing steel shelled flak helmets, using a doubled
walled outer aluminum shell similar to the NSFK glider helmet. Advanced flight
helmet studies in hard helmet penetration resistance and crash-worthiness by
Germany’s aeronautical laboratories were in progress when Berlin fell, but
again it appears the technology simply had not yet been sufficiently advanced to
permit adoption of production standards which truly satisfied the requirements.
The closest that these studies got to producing a production hard shell 'crash
helmet' for Luftwaffe flyers were the steel flak shells that fitted over the
soft leather flight helmet; they were not intended, however to protect aircrew
from inertial forces of increasingly higher-speed flight, and were devised
instead to protect from flak injury.
As
has been mentioned before, prior to the introduction of the new jet turbine
engined aircraft of the 40s, the standard flight helmet was typically a soft
fabric or leather helmet. As the potential for buffeting in jet aircraft
cockpits became known, American researchers’ thoughts focused on devising some
sort of enhanced protective headgear to protect the contracted civilian flight
test pilots who were evaluating the new jets at such secret testing sites as
Muroc Field, in the Mojave desert. The result was a number of what are now
called ‘transitional’ helmet designs. These were typically constructed by
private aircraft company personnel for their own use and typically incorporated
some form of hard protective hemispherical crown attached to the upper
hemisphere of the standard soft fabric or leather flight helmet. Examples known
to have existed and been used were made from old leather football helmets,
phenolic resin miners’ helmets, pith horse polo helmets, and even cork-lined
vintage race-car driving helmets. One such design became known as the
“Tanker” interim helmet, which used the compressed fiber top half of the US
Army M-1 leather tanker helmet attached to a standard USAAF ANH-15 or A-10A
fabric flight helmet; this helmet was used briefly by early USAAF Lockheed P-80 Shooting
Star crews in 1946 and 1947. Even as this ‘transitional’ helmet was
finding application in the first production USAAF jet, research on hard
protective helmets was being conducted by the Air Force’s Wright Patterson
Aero Lab and Northrop Aviation’s Dr. Charles Lombard.
In
late 1947 the first standard USN and USAF production ‘hard hats’ were introduced,
made from pressure-molded cotton fabric and thermally set phenolic resin
plastics materials. The first standard issue US Navy hard protective helmet was
designated the H-1; this one-piece helmet had a distinctive shape which set it
apart visually from the first USAF hard shell design, the P-1 (which had been
inspired by Dr. Lombard's studies in helmet design at Northrop and the Wright
aero-laboratory). After the introduction of the one-piece Navy H-2 helmet
(similar to the H-1), the Navy soon started examining the possibilities of a
two-part helmet design that used a soft fabric inner helmet over which a
fiberglass outer helmet shell was used. This led to Air Force consideration of
its own two-part helmet proposal, an experimental study prototype designated the
P-2, but the P-2 helmet concept was ultimately rejected and never placed in
production. The US Navy, after producing their fully integrated one-piece H-1
and H-2 hard helmets, finally standardized on the two-part helmet approach and
this led to production of their subsequent (early 1950s) H-3 and H4 series
protective helmets.
Quite
soon after it was adopted, the USAF's P-1 helmet was upgraded to an improved and
modified version called the P-1A, which was in turn followed by the P-1B
(investigation suggests that the P-1B was merely a ‘re-designated’ P-1A). This
change in designation may have had something to do with the decision to cancel
the Air Force’s two-part P-2 helmet, although that has never been confirmed to
my knowledge. In 1953, the P-3 helmet specification, which was the first USAF
effort to provide an externally attached and articulated rigid visor (for
windblast protection), was introduced. The P-3 helmet was essentially a P-1A/B
type helmet to which a rigid plastic visor was permanently affixed. Both the P-3
and a subsequent P-4 design originally used a unique side-latching, trackless
visor design; this was superseded somewhat later by an improved visor design on
the improved P-4A helmet and in 1959 a final upgrade specification was
designated the P-4B (each of the two latter helmets used fiberglass as a basic
shell material instead of the cotton fabric/phenolic resin shell construction of
earlier USAF P-helmets). The P-4A and P-4B visors were identical, but
communications components differed in that the P-4B helmet used an oxygen mask
communications cord to link the helmet to the aircraft communications system;
this change did away with the so-called "pigtail" communications cord
exiting the helmet at the rear, as found on P-1 through P-4A helmets.
Incorporating the same rigid external visor assembly used earlier, the new visor
articulation of the P-4A and P-4B helmets did away with the earlier complex and
awkward side-latch mechanism and substituted a central track with a release
actuator mounted on the upper part of the visor. The new central track visor
system was infinitely easier for a pilot to manipulate in flight than the early
side-latch design (although still less than fully ideal, and there remained some
issues involving potential for snagging riser shrouds upon ejection).
Changes
in helmet communications system components (earphones, com cords, and
connectors) continued to be made throughout the 1949 to 1960 period. As each new
protective helmet T.O. specification came into standard Air Force use, older
helmets still being used were invariably updated to meet the latest technical
change (T.O.) requirements. For this reason, most examples of the earliest US
Air Force hard-shell crash helmets (such as the P-1, P-1A/P-1B, and P-3) that
are found today are substantially modified and upgraded and therefore invariably
do not reflect their original issue configuration (this is rarely the case with US Navy
counterparts, interestingly enough). It is not unusual to routinely find early
P-1A series helmets that have been fitted with a late-model (central track P-4A
type) rigid external visor and corresponding H-143/AIC communications
components, which technically updated them to the last P-4B specifications. For
this reason, some knowledge of and familiarity with the complexities of the
official Air Force Technical Orders applicable to the P-series helmets is
mandatory if one is to successfully identify and correctly label a particular
specimen. (Note: for a capsule summary of the important specifications and
changes effected, see the attached appendix following this article, which
provides a useful baseline of basic data).
Faced
with a need to upgrade naval aviator head protection, the Navy’s Air Crew
Equipment Laboratory (ACEL) in Pennsylvania soon produced (1958) an entirely new
protective helmet design called the APH-5, a bellwether design which basically
set the general standard for all subsequent helmets used by all US military
aviation forces from that time onward. By 1958 the US Air force had evaluated
the Navy’s APH-5 design and found it significantly advanced over the old
P-series helmets. This led to the adoption of a design based upon the Navy’s
APH-5, which was designated the US Air Force HGU-2/P; by 1963 the old original
P-series helmets had been practically replaced by the new design with its
covered external visor. Partly due to production and distribution delays, the
older P-series helmets remained in use well after the new design had been
accepted as “standard” and were generally taken out of service when they
were damaged in use. Interestingly, when the early HGU-2/P was introduced it
featured the same leather oxygen mask snap fastener leather tab system used on
the original P-series helmets, but in the mid-60s, a new oxygen mask retention
system, using what were called MD-1 ‘Hardman kits’ (an oxygen mask shell and
harness suspension system which utilized notched bayonets and helmet-mounted
receivers) partly replaced the long-used snap-tab system on Air Force helmets.
The Navy also used the Hardman receiver system on its later APH-5 helmets before
introducing a modification on its later APH-6 model, which incorporated a newer
mask retention system utilizing unique ‘butterfly’ type pinch releases. The
Hardman receiver system with its ‘Christmas tree bayonets’ did not remain in
use long, as both services eventually standardized on the presently used
‘Sierra kit’ bayonet type mask receivers, but the rigid plastic Hardman
MS22001 oxygen mask shell suspension found increasing favor by both services, in
combination with the newer Sierra receivers and bayonets. In passing, it should
be noted that there were several interim helmet designs explored by both
services (although not adopted in large production volumes); these include the
US Navy H-5 (successfully market abroad but not used for any length of time by
the US Navy) and the APH-7 series helmets (also market abroad), examples of
which may still be found, although infrequently.
One
especially interesting concept developed in the 60s period was the so-called
'clam-shell' design. Technically known as the US Air Force HGU-15/P 'Windblast
Helmet' (USAF version) and the US Navy AOH-1 / HGU-20/P (US Navy version), and
developed as an integrated head protective unit with oxygen breathing system
built in, the 'clam-shell' featured a two-part shell that opened and shut like a
marine bi-valve's shell. It featured a swivel actuated face visor, with separate
articulated sun shade, it looked very much like the conventional pressure helmet
used during this time (viz. the Navy's Mk. IV full pressure helmet assembly of
the early 60s). While the windblast protection afforded by the whole-head
encasing clam-shell helmet design in emergency high speed ejection was excellent
(it was intended for principal use in the Air Force’s new Convair F-106 Mach 2
interceptor), there were also aspects of the design that were found to be
operationally awkward (especially for high-G air combat situations). These
included substantial weight of the assembly (bearing down disagreeably on the
wearer's spine in high negative-G maneuvers and turns), fouling of the
chin-piece on parachute harness hardware, lack of adequate peripheral fields of
vision, and lastly, a tendency to leak around the rubber face seal of the
assembly. Thus, after a brief period of testing by the US Air Force, and short
term operational flight testing by the US Navy, the 800 or so 'clam-shells'
produced on a US Navy contract were rejected and the design faded temporarily
into a dusty corner of history (surprisingly, it re-emerged somewhat later in a
different form for NASA crews).
One
other experimental program of note was the USAF 'TLSS' (Tactical Life Support
System) project of the mid-80s, which attempted to combine for the first time
all elements of a complete environmental protection package for high-performance
aircraft crews (project objectives included high-altitude protection, NBC
protection, and anti-G protection). While the TLSS system (an ambitious project
from the onset that was extensively flight tested at the Edwards Air Force
Flight Test Center, near Mojave, California) was never adopted as originally
designed, the many research advances derived from this important project
resulted directly in the consequent operational Combat
Edge system in use today, and provided proof
of concept for many other products later used in the F-22 Raptor Advanced Air
Superiority Fighter. Of special note is the fact that much of the precursor
research that gave birth to the TLSS system derived directly from pioneering RAF
aviation medicine studies of the 50s.
From
the mid-60s onwards, modifications continued to be made as advances in aircrew
protective helmet technology led to new products, incorporating both new
materials and improved fabrication techniques. These modifications included
communications upgrades, twin-visor designs (one clear and one smoked, a feature
principally used in bombers, training aircraft, and special applications for
protection against bird strikes), the use of advanced polymer materials in the
external shell, and updated oxygen breathing mask systems. In fact, a whole new
series of designs has since evolved, making accurate identification of these
items more challenging than ever for those recently introduced to the field of
modern era aircraft helmet development history. Overall, one of the chief
lessons learned from 20 years of research was that for high-G fighter type
air-combat situations, two factors were heavily weighted over all others:
excellent peripheral visibility and low mass/weight.
Complicating
things somewhat, the wide range of aircraft life support systems used in US Navy
aircraft during the 60s through the 80s resulted in even more complexities in
helmet and mask systems, which varied considerably from those meeting US Air
Force standards. After years of this extreme variance between Air Force and Navy
requirements, a mandated effort was made by the DoD in the late 80s to
standardize both services’ life support equipment requirements that to date
has been moderately successful, with lessons learned about suitable high-G
protection and aircrew survival requirements being uniformly applied to the life
support equipment of all US military aviation services.
Among
the most important advances in recent protective helmet design have been
enhancements designed to improve peripheral vision for fighter pilots, attempts
to reduce helmet weight to lessen effects of high G-forces on the pilot’s
neck, and substantially upgraded oxygen masks and mask retention hardware. Many
of these modifications, which are at present reflected in such more advanced
assemblies as the US Air Force HGU-55/P and MBU-20/P Combat Edge system (or the
US Navy's HGU-87/P and MBU-20/P helmet and mask equivalent CE system) for
enhanced combat maneuvering capability, have literally been forced into being by
the need to protect pilots from the physically brutal G forces modern
high-performance aircraft are now capable of inflicting upon their more fragile
human ‘components’. These changes have been prompted by the fact that for
the first time ever, modern military jets are being engineered to withstand more
Gs that their human pilots are capable of sustaining.
COLLECTING
‘JET-AGE’ FLIGHT HELMETS AS MILITARIA:
Today,
one of the most rapidly growing areas of militaria collecting activity is
centered on military flight helmets of the modern or ‘jet’ era. Although a
few individuals have been collecting flight helmets for many decades, only
recently has this special area within general militaria collecting gathered
monumental inertia. One of the early precipitating stimuli of this groundswell
was the release of the movies ‘TOP
GUN’ and Tom Wolfe’s ‘THE
RIGHT STUFF.’ Focusing public interest anew on the glamour
and glory of modern ‘hot’ military aviation, these films created a surge in
the area of collecting of modern aviation memorabilia in general. Subsequently,
the relatively recent release of Alan Wise and Mike Breuningers' excellent book,
JET
AGE FLIGHT HELMETS (1996) has predictably resulted in a
further massive wave of interest in the collecting of these interesting
artifacts of modern military aviation. Although there are some generally
overlooked errors in the Wise and Breuninger book, prior to its release there
had been no adequate concentrated historical reference to act as a knowledgeable
starting point for interest in modern flight helmets (perhaps the most glaring
error in ‘JAFH’ is found on page 13 of that book, wherein a P-1A helmet has
been misidentified as a “P-2”—more on this subject later). JET
AGE FLIGHT HELMETS
accomplishes this feat in a single substantial tour-de-force
of photo-documentation and the book’s cost ($75) is a small price to pay for
such a beautifully illustrated and valuable reference work on a formerly obscure
and under-researched subject (Schiffer Publications, Atglen, PA).
There
are, of course, several even more specialised sub-areas within the general field
of helmet collecting which bear mentioning. Some aviation headgear specialists
limit themselves almost exclusively to high-altitude protection components such
as pressure helmets (and their component partial and full pressure suit
systems), eschewing anything more than a passing interest in helmets used in
ordinary (non-high altitude) aircraft operations. As this is a very specialized
area of interest and subsequent to a recent wave of increased interest in such
things by modern aviation militaria collectors, the spectacular costs associated
with collecting of high altitude items have recently soared beyond the reach of
most individuals of ordinary means.
Regrettably,
this same broadened awareness of military flight helmet collecting in general
has had some substantial impact upon availability and cost of the more common
helmet artifacts among collectors. For one thing, general prices have begun to
increase to absurd levels for otherwise relatively ordinary items (due to
lessened supply and enhanced demand). For another, more than a few people
advertising themselves as being in the business of authoritatively selling
aviation memorabilia are now asking unrealistically high prices for items they
actually lack any real authoritative knowledge of. Although there are
‘serious’ specialists such as Wise, Breuninger (there are actually two
Breuningers, both brothers), Wilson, Gilliam, Daugherty, Norris, LeBeau,
Patterson, Mattson, and a few others who have true expertise in these areas,
many others lack basic understanding of the technical variations frequently
found in early military flight helmets (which constitute the basis of their
distinctive model identification). This insufficiency of technical knowledge is
reflected in their advertising and pricing of some items far beyond their true
worth. The novice collector has, regrettably, no way of knowing this until he
has gained more understanding and knowledge on the subject.
An
excellent example of this is found in the misidentification of some early
jet-age helmets (particularly USAF P-series types) by a handful of aviation
memorabilia dealers. As mentioned earlier, the early P series helmets, which
remained in use after newer types ‘came into standard’, were regularly
updated to meet the latest Air Force TO Standard specs. Consequently, what is
commonly advertised as being a ‘P-1A’ helmet by an unknowledgeable dealer
may actually bear little factual resemblance to the original “as issued”
P-1A helmet that the advanced collector may be seeking (due to the possible
addition of a P-4 type external visor, bayonet mask receivers, upgraded
communications sets, or possibly even a P-4/P-4 type helmet suspension harness
fitted to a P-1A shell). The only method by which one encounters true “as
issued” original-specification P-1A helmets these days is when they have come
from personal effects saved by a family that had a member on active duty in the
Air Force at the time when the helmet was issued and who kept it when he left
the service (shortly after it was issued or before it had been affected by T.O
changes). As such, and usually painted in colorful squadron markings, these
helmets when found today constitute a fascinating ‘time-warp anomaly’
discovery that makes them extremely valuable finds to the serious early flight
helmet tyro.
Due
to these pitfalls, care must also be exercised in buying flight helmets
sight-unseen through mail order businesses, unless the seller is known
personally, as attempts to ‘rebuild’ or restore helmets purely for resale
profit potential can occasionally be encountered in instances wherein a somewhat
less than completely honest dealer attempts to pass off a ‘restored’ item as
an original. There is, unfortunately, no substitute for a visual, hands-on
inspection of any helmet one is interested in, with reference to type, condition
and originality, unless the dealer’s reputation is well established. Still
another 'market-induced' practice that has come into being recently, is the
practice by some of buying old flight helmet shells and 'restoring' or
'rebuilding' them with new or surplus components. While some of these
efforts are exceptional, there are far too many that are inaccurate, less than
expertly crafted, and in some cases, completely incorrect. The careful and
knowledgeable collector takes great pains to learn as much as possible about the
history of vintage aircrew life support equipment so as to be adequately
prepared to spot these 'phony' restorations and avoid them when they are clearly
overpriced (some of the best information sources are the old military Technical
Order manuals and publications that were used by life support personnel
themselves).
A
further effect prompted by the recently enhanced interest in military flight
helmet collecting is price gouging, resulting from increased demand for an
increasingly smaller number of items. Perhaps the best example of this is the
current asking price for an HGU-20/P “clam-shell” (Aviator’s Integrated
Oxygen Helmet, or AOH-1). [Originally produced in limited quantities by
Robertshaw Controls (with sub-contractor Sabre Industries) in the mid-60s (and
somewhat later by GENTEX for NASA), not many years ago few individuals actually
knew much about this very unique and interesting helmet, let alone were willing
to pay almost any price to obtain one. Operationally tested by both the US Air
Force and the US Navy as an advanced design which provided enhanced wind-blast
protection and eliminated the need for a discrete oxygen mask, the AOH-1 design
was found to be too cumbersome and visually restrictive for naval combat use and
was
ultimately
retired after a short period of trial applications in USN F4B Phantom IIs, A-4 Skyhawks,
and A-7 Corsair II aircraft.
After limited operational testing by two squadrons of USAF F104s and F105s,
using two custom fabricated ‘clamshells’ made to USAF specifications, the
helmet was not procured for regular production under USAF contract. Much later
(early 80s), the same design was revived by GENTEX for NASA and issued to flight
crews of the first STS space shuttle missions (up to and including the ill-fated
Challenger mission in 1986) as
an LEH crash protective helmet (known as the Launch & Entry Helmet, it was adopted virtually unmodified
from the Navy’s HGU-20/P except for the addition of a second microphone and a
Kevlar shell). 16 unique NBC defense versions of the USAF’s HGU-15/P variant
were also made for testing in a joint USAF/Army chemical defense program at
Aberdeen (aside from these 16 and the two custom made HGU-15/P helmets used in
USAF operational tests, there were no other USAF HGU-15/P versions ever made).]
At one time these 16 helmets and the HGU-20/P (US Navy version) were available
for as little as several hundred dollars each on the open market. Today,
excellent examples used in US Navy service routinely bring prices in excess of
several thousand dollars! Surviving specimens of the ultra-rare 16 HGU-15/P
helmets that were specially modified as NBC protective assemblies (which program
began in April of 68 and ended in June of 70) can command as much $4000 or more.
As recently as April of 2004, a nice specimen of the first standard issue (1948)
US Air Force hard helmet, the P-1, went for almost $4000!
THE
FUTURE OF FLIGHT HELMET COLLECTING AS MILITARIA:
As
this is being written, existing stocks of many of the earlier jet-age flight
helmets are in the process of being depleted and are disappearing. Some, such as
original, unmodified examples of the early USAF HGU-2/P have become increasingly
rare (most were attrited during the Vietnam war, unfortunately, and thus early
HGU-2/P examples remain one of the less common finds today), and others, such as
the fascinating HGU-20/P “clam-shell”, are now beyond the reach of all but
the most serious and/or fanatical collectors Still, the story of these
interesting artifacts of the jet age is richly rewarding both to those who are
interested in the history of aeronautical protection equipment and to those who
collect aeronautical memorabilia as a hobby.
This
is especially so now that many foreign jet-age helmets of other nations (many
formerly hostile enemies of the US) are currently finding their way into this
country and comparisons between foreign and US design approaches are revealing
interesting advances in the evolution of aircrew protection technology which the
US did not instigate or even fully consider! Examples of this may be found in
Russian (formerly Soviet) aircrew helmets (ZSh-5 and ZSh-7) which featured
visors that automatically actuated upon ejection, and in occipital air bladders
which served both to help combat negative G effects (termed “G-LOC”, or
“Gravity-induced Loss of Consciousness”) and hold oxygen masks more firmly
to the face during high-G maneuvering. In both areas, Russia pioneered
development of the technology that is today considered mandatory for enhanced
safety in advanced fighter operations. The use of a snap-strap secured hard
visor, such as found on the current US Air Force HGU-55/P helmet, was actually
introduced by the French at a much earlier date! The interesting and somewhat
hard to find Chinese TK-4A pressure helmet is another unusual design that
combines features of several different design approaches; bringing to mind older
helmets such as the US MA-2 and English Taylor model E pressure helmets, the
TK-4A also resembles more modern pressure helmets such as the USAF HGU-8/P and
the HGU-20/P in certain aspects. Also, due to the fact that both ‘Cold War’
nations (the USA and USSR) studied and copied each other’s designs, the
Russian P-3 helmet copy known as the ZSh-2 (used with an MS22001 mask copy known
as the KM-24 mask) is today a very, very rare helmet and a seldom seen type in
the West.
If
asked to make a personal list of a few of the most sought after and scarce jet
age US aircrew helmets today, I would have to include all the early US Navy
helmets (H-1 through H-5), all the early USAF helmets (from original P-1 through
P-3), the early USAF Pressure helmets (including the K-1, MA-2, HGK-13, etc.),
clearly the 'clam-shells' (especially the very rare USAF HGU-15/P 'Windblast
Helmet' and NASA LEH versions), the TLSS helmet, The US Navy HGU-35/P, and the
HGU-51/P ICDS NBC helmet.
With
authentic, original examples of older jet-age helmets starting to become scarce,
collectors must be especially watchful for unscrupulous individuals advertising
helmets for sale at great cost as “genuine”, that have been ‘built-up’
(or put together from parts and pieces, and often inaccurately). Most reputable
dealers take pains to be honest in their business, but there are a notable few
who take grossly unwarranted liberties in this manner. A number of these are
found lurking on eBay and other ‘on-line’ auction sites (as always, caveat
emptor!).
On-line
auction houses such as eBay have had both a positive and negative effect on
aeronautical flight helmet collecting; while prices for examples offered
frequently rise way out of proportion to their actual value to a knowledgeable
expert, a plus side is that many, many interesting specimens come to light that
would otherwise not become discovered or found.
Hopefully,
however, reason, a sense of proportion, and a spirit of fairness shall prevail
as retail business and commercial speculation in the growing hobby of collecting
aircrew protective helmets heats up, driving flight helmet prices
unrealistically higher in a continuing cost escalation to the hypoxemic
sub-stratospheric heights wherein such items were originally intended to protect
their wearers!
Addendum:
Presently, two very valuable and useful internet flightgear discussion forums
exist on the web for collectors and life support historians. Originators of the
concept are Sven Schaffers and Ron Kraan from the Nederlands, whose site ‘Flightgear-on-Line’
may be found at (http://www.flightgear.dk/).
Perhaps the most useful site, frequented by more ‘serious’ individuals
interested in life support history is the ‘Flying
Clothing Forum’ (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flyingclothing/)
The purpose of these internet forums is to serve as a central information
exchange for anyone interested in flightgear and aircrew life support subjects
(helmets, oxygen masks, ejection systems, survival equipment, etc.). Membership
in the first group is open to all without qualification, while membership in the
second is limited to nomination or invitation only (a petition for membership is
seldom refused, however). Moderator of the ‘Flying Clothing Forum’ is
Colonel Steen Hartov of the Royal Danish Air Force.
Photo
and audio credits:
Thanks
to NASA, Lockheed-Martin Skunk Works, and Trey
Turner III of Check-6 Aviation for a few photographs used in this
article; all others belong to the author. Audio track is courtesy of James
Charles Kaelin (http://www.earthstation1.com/)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
A
History of the US Air Force P-series Protective Flight Helmets When
the National Defense Act of 1947 resulted in (among other things) the
emergence of the US Air Force as a separate service, the requirement for a
pilot's protective military flight helmet had already been issued under
the aegis of the Army Air Forces command and a design finalised. US jet
aircraft, notably the P-80 Shooting Star (the first standard production
American combat jet aircraft generated in large numbers), had been flying
since about mid-1945. Just as the pilots of these aircraft lacked adequate
head protection (necessitated by the higher performance of their
machines), so too did the aircraft themselves lack any sort of vestigial
provision for rapid, safe emergency egress (ejection seat systems), other
than the traditional 'bail-out' over the side of a stricken craft. Prior
to the institution of a standard protective helmet design for use by all
high performance aircraft crews, a number of unofficial and innovative
designs were used by the earliest jet aviators--particularly by the pilots
of the new Lockheed P-80A Shooting Star squadrons, whose personnel devised
interim cockpit “bump protection” in 1946 by using the rigid fiber
shells from WWII ‘tank crew’ helmets as an outer shell over existing
soft AN-H-15 (summer), A-11 (winter), and A-10 (summer) flying helmets. US
Army Air Force Specification number 3277, drawing number 47R3184, resulted
in the very first hard protective flight helmet, designated the "Type
P-1 Flying Helmet". This was the result of Technical Order (TO)
13-1-37 / WF-(A)-O-17 Dec 1948, originating from Wright Field’s
aeronautical laboratory. At about the same time, the first ejection seat
systems were being introduced into jet aircraft; it is interesting to note
that Army Air Force air research and development investigators had
actually been concerned with and were actively looking into the pressing
problem of how to exit a high performance aircraft safely, somewhat in
advance of parallel concerns about protecting the head of jet fighter and
bomber aircrewmen who flew the machines. Further, no less an authority on
aviation medicine and flight physiology than the US Army Air Corps’ Dr.
Harry Armstrong had much earlier (late 30s) investigated the possible
benefits of rigid protective helmets for aircrewmen and found them
‘impracticable’. Over
the next 15 years (from about 1947) the Type P-1 Flying Helmet
(substantially based upon pioneering studies undertaken by Dr. Charles Lombard) gradually evolved into its final configuration (known as the Type
P-4B), a process that is best understood by modest familiarization with a
profusion of complex USAF technical orders (TOs) that accompanied the
updated specifications. Just how these changes regulated identification of
the P-series helmets will be discussed briefly here, in hopes that this
will enable those who are fascinated by modern flight protective headgear
to more readily understand and identify the differences between all the
variants of the important ‘P-series’ helmets, that were our first
‘hard’ protective headgear. [One
final note: Although an earlier type designated helmet was frequently
upgraded to a subsequent specification, new production helmets
manufactured at the precise moment a specification was in force were also
given the same 'current type designation'. Thus, a type designation could
be borne equally by both an older helmet (through T.O. upgrading) and a
new one, by virtue of simply being a newly manufactured unit made to
current specifications. This fact has created endless amounts of
confusion, as regards positively and correctly identifying a particular
P-series helmet today, and it is the chief reason why so many factors must
be considered in deciding what designation a P-series helmet should
properly bear in a chronological history.] The
Type P-1 flying helmet
The US Army Air Force
Type P-1 Flying Helmet (for as such it was first known) was constructed of
pressure and heat molded laminated cotton duck fabric that had been
saturated with phenolic-resin (essentially similar to "Bakelite"
materials). It was produced in one shell size (based closely upon the
original “Lombard helmet” design) and used an internal head suspension
sling of then-conventional design (similar to that used in Army infantry
helmet liners and tanker crew helmets), consisting of a leather and cotton
sling that could be adjusted through the use of laces at the rear to
accommodate just about any size head. [Anecdotally, it is interesting to
note that a study performed by the RAF in the 1950s found that pilots of
fast, high performance (fighter) aircraft tended to have smaller head
sizes than those who flew slower, multi-engine (bomber and transport)
machines. We will stop short of engaging in any speculation about the size
of the cranium in relation to the size of the pilot's ego, but the
possibilities for formulating idle hypotheses are fascinating!] The P-1 shell was
issued in semi-gloss, off-white color paint, although it was not unusual
to find them painted to suit the wearer's whims, with colorful
personalised or squadron markings. The P-1 head-suspension sling crown pad
was imprinted in white with "Army Air Forces" (this was very
soon thereafter changed to "US Air Forces", and later “U.S.
Air Force”, when the service became independent of the US Army in late
1947). While I have no absolute
evidence that the earliest P-1 helmets were issued with a winged star
decal on the outer forehead segment of the hard-shell (as in the manner of
the "US Air Forces" decal found on the subsequent P-1A), my
resources indicate that many did feature a decal of the traditional Army
Air (Corps) Force winged star on a blue circular field (not unlike that
used later, but without the lettering). Numerous photos and images from
this period appear to provide evidence of this fact. The early P-1 head
sling was identified by a woven black label that read "Sling Assembly
for helmet, Pilot's Protective, Type P-1, Drawing no. 47D3185, Contract
no. W33-038-AC1947S-(19413)". A manufacturer's name appeared in the
last line and as per usual there were a number of primary subcontractors
who produced the sling (among them Switlik Parachute Company, The Selby
Shoe Company, The Bates Company, & the Joseph Beugelson Company). The
P-1 head sling purportedly enabled a wide range of sizing adjustment, from
about 6½ through 7¾, in use with the standard single size hard outer
shell. The
P-1 type sling, initially made of leather and OD cotton fabric, was later
made of leather and nylon fabric (starting with subsequent TO versions of
the P-1: P-1A/P-1B). Standard military white parachute riser cord was used
to attach the sling to the hard shell and this is identified in the P-1 TO
as being "Cord, Nylon, Type III, Spec no. AN-C-63", from which
the inner core strands had been removed. The Type P-1 helmet did not have
a fixed (riveted) chin strap as did later upgraded versions, but instead
could be secured to the head if the wearer desired, through use of a chin
cup that attached to the lowest of the snaps on the oxygen mask mounting
tabs. Invariably, when an A-14 or A-13A mask was worn with the helmet, the
mask itself served as a head securing mechanism. There was no nape strap
on the P-1 helmet (as with P-1A/P-1B). Further, photographs we have seen
of the original P-1 helmet show it to have a black rubber edge roll that
is distinctively different from that fitted to the P-1A/P-1B helmet; this
fact is substantiated by examination of actual surviving specimens. The
P-1 helmet also had black-finished leather oxygen mask tabs, positioned on
either side of the front face opening, each tab fitted with three
screw-threaded snaps for securing either the A-14 Demand Oxygen Mask or
the A-13A (later MS22001) Pressure Demand Oxygen Mask; later P-helmets
used brown-finished leather tabs that did not protrude through the
edge of the beading and had off-white
rubber edge rolls of a slightly different construction. A paper
specification label was fixed to the inside of the hard shell in the area
where a nape strap would later be added (in compliance with the P-1A TO). The Type P-1 Flying Helmet as originally configured used the Type HS-38 headset, fitted with ANB-H-1 receivers; The helmet was subsequently upgraded to the HS-38A type headset, which used a slightly modified receiver element. This final headset type used (the HS-38A), was the type also used exclusively by the P-1A, P-1B, and P-3 helmets to come. All of these were fitted with the same kapok-filled, chamois leather covered earphone cushions found in all existing soft (leather or fabric) flying helmets, although the cushion attachment method differed from that used in the later P-1A TO upgrade. Active radio communications elements of the earliest original P-1 (initially using the standard ANB-H-1 WWII type electromagnetic earphone receivers) was identical to that in use on all soft fabric and leather US Army Air Forces flying helmets from WWII onwards. Physically, the early ANB-H-1 receiver is entirely encased in black plastic and has screw-securing wire connectors; the later modified (HS-38A) receiver has a silver rung around the upper surface and has connections that are soldered on. One important feature
of the original P-1 helmet is found in the original manner of attaching
the HS-38 headset cushions. The P-1 helmet initially used a system of
earphone mounting retainer 'flaps'. These leather flaps were situated
above and below the earphone hard-rubber holders on each side of the
helmet and the cushions were secured in place with these flaps. This
system proved less efficient than desired in actual flight use and in the
subsequent P-1A design, earphone pads were attached via lacing at top (to
the head sling harness) and bottom (to the bottom left and right hard
shell). The original US stock numbers for the
HS-38 and HS-38A headsets used in the P-1 helmet (and also in the
subsequent P-1A) were "Electric Headset, 1790-207625000" (or
1790-207625500) and "Electric Headset, 1790-207626000". The
early P-1 HS-38 type headset featured a single (high impedance) PL-54 type phone jack plug
on the end of its com cord; initially there was no JK-48 microphone connector
attached on the left side of the helmet shell that connected to the
headset system loom. Later, when the HS-38A headset was adopted, the JK-48 microphone
female connector was installed on the left helmet shell and constituted part of
the headset communications loom & cord (today, examples
may be found with HS-38 headset installed using either the red PL-354--low
impedance--phone jack plug or the newer U-75/U 'combination connector'). When the later HS-38A headset was adopted,
the U-75/U communications connector replaced the single standard phone
jack connector on the distal end of the helmet’s ‘pigtail’
communications cord (that exited from the rear of the helmet shell). The P-1 helmet, in
its original, non-TO-updated issue configuration (with early HS-38 headset
and ANB-H-1 receiver elements), is today very
seldom seen,
and P-1
examples that are still able to be found have inevitably been upgraded
to later specifications. Most have long since disappeared as these helmets
easily suffered structural failures in flight use and were taken out of
service to be destroyed. Only a very few examples are now to be found and
these were usually kept by the families of pilots to whom they were issued
and whom had left the Air Force before the P-1A specifications were
introduced. In terms of rarity, the Army Air Force Type P-1 Flying Helmet
is on par with the original US Navy hard-hat design, the H-1 (of which
also very few surviving examples are to be found today). Although the P-1
specification (3277) is dated 1948, quantities of the new helmet were very
limited at first and thus it was in short supply among US Air Force flying
personnel at the onset, when introduced; photographs may be seen of P-80
pilots who were still occasionally wearing the soft tan ANH-15 & A-10
summer flight helmets, or the brown leather A-11 well, into the 50s (this
was especially true for training applications, particularly in
propeller-driven aircraft such as the T-6, the P-51, where the soft fabric
helmets continued in standard use for many years). As might well be
understood, the first P-1 hard hat issue was prioritised for first-line,
high performance, jet fighter aircraft crews. Before many of the helmets
had been issued, however, the P-1 was upgraded to newer P-1A
specifications and therefore there were not great numbers of the original,
unmodified design manufactured (we are presently uncertain of specific
numbers produced). By the time the Korean War began, the P-1A
specification had been issued and most of the hard helmets used by US Air
Force personnel when that war began were either originally manufactured as
P-1As or had already been upgraded to P-1A specs. Of additional interest
from a historical standpoint is evidence (Col. Ralph Parr, quoted in the
new book "Hot Shots: An Oral History of Air Force Combat Pilots of
the Korean War", ISBN 0-688-16455-2) that highlights the scarcity of
these original hard-shell protective helmets at the onset of the Korean
"Police Action". Col. Parr states that in early June of 1951, as
he entered active Korean combat in the new F-86 Sabre, he was using a
"broken helmet" (presumably a P-1) that was held together with
duct tape; he further states that these helmets were so scarce that
several of the pilots in his squadron flew wearing the type of plastic
football helmet that were in use in the early 50s by college football
players (that the pilots themselves had brought over to Korea, or had sent
to them from the US by relatives). This fact probably had at least
something to do with a later decision to "reissue" the P-1A
(leading to the P-1B type re-designation), after it was found that the
older helmets were still needed by aircrews after the P-2 concept was
cancelled. The
type P-1A flying helmet
A P-1 helmet, thus
modified, was specified as the P-1A. As was the usual practice, any older
P-1s in use when the new spec came into 'standard' were upgraded to the
newer specification, but any new units manufactured during this period
were produced already incorporating these improvements into the new stock.
Whereas the P-1 shell was made in one size that accommodated all heads,
via adjustment of the head harness sling, the P-1A helmet shell was made
in two sizes (small and large). This was an important innovation that made
a proper, comfortable fit more readily achievable. The head harness slings
used in each of the two shells again permitted more precise adjustment.
Finally, a unique identifying characteristic of an original P-1 upgraded
to P-1A specifications is a cross-hatched lacing of the front lateral
edgeroll, where the edgeroll was sewn shut with heavy duty thread after the original protruding mask suspension tabs had been removed
and replaced. The
type P-1B flying helmet
The type P-1B Flying
Helmet specification was created through a change in designation
nomenclature only and the P-1A and P-1B helmets are otherwise identical in
all respects. This came about as a result of a rescinded decision to take
the P-1A out of standard service when the P-2 helmet design was cancelled;
as demands of the new war in Korea required more and more of the new
aircrew protective helmets, and in the face of a critical shortage of
these items, the P-1A was re-introduced
into standard issue with the designation P-1B (reference earlier
remarks made by Colonel Ralph Parr of the 18th Fighter Wing--F-86 Sabre,
Korea). The
type P-2 flying helmet
[One additional fact has emerged that has led to some confusion among a few individuals who have erroneously identified P-1A/B helmets as being of P-2 specification. This is the fact that immediately prior to the US Air Force’s decision to cancel the P-2 production, an unknown number of head harness slings with woven labels identifying them as “Head harness, Type P-2”, were produced. When the P-2 helmet order was cancelled, these “P-2” head harnesses were used as replacement units in existing P-1A and P-1B helmets. It is important to reiterate that the P-2 helmet was never produced or issued; these P-2 harnesses are not to be misconstrued as being evidence that the helmet they have been used in is a genuine “P-2 helmet”.] Available information shows that the production contract for the never to be produced two-part P-2 helmet was given to the Paramount Rubber Company, the same contractor that had produced the original P-1 to US Army Air Forces specifications.
The
type P-3 flying helmet
An item that is worth
noting in passing is that due to the constraints of the Korean War on
supplies in the combat areas, repairs to the headset cushion assemblies of
P-1 and P-3 type helmets were frequently made using salvaged or cut-out
kapok-filled chamois leather-covered cushion 'doughnuts' removed from
AN-H-15 and A-10 type fabric helmets. Although the cushions were not
absolutely identical in every respect to those used in the rigid P-series
units, they were nearly so, and this explains the discovery of what appear
to be AN-H-15 & A-10 type ear cushion units fitted to early P series
helmets that were used in and around Korea from 1951 through 1953. For
this reason it is therefore not technically 'incorrect' to “restore” a
helmet by replacing old, worn-out P-helmet earphone cushions with AN-H-15
and A-10 type units today, when rebuilding these early items of headgear.
There was, after all, an expedient historical and practical precedent for
the practice! Because of its
superior wind-blast protection, and also because of its additional
sun-glare protective function, the Type P-3 Flying Helmet was mandated for
use in all high-speed, high performance jet fighters and bombers. Somewhat
later slight modifications of the basic 'side-latch' rigid external visor
were adopted. The differences between the original version and the later
two versions are not readily apparent until helmets fitted with each
version are compared side by side. The principal modification was
two-fold: the protrusive 'tab' located at the top of the visor mounting
bar was done away with and the length of the side latch securing arm was
slightly lengthened. In the case of the latter modification, this small
change permitted the visor to swing up completely out of the peripheral
visual area of the pilot's face, whereas the original ratchet-securing
articulation permitted part of the lower lens on both sides to slightly
obscure the upper periphery of the pilot's field of view. [It is
worthwhile to note that the rigid shaded visor lens used with the P-3 type
side-latched visor came in three sizes (small, medium, and large); the
required size was determined as being equal to the distance between the
top center of the visor and its lower nose-bridge point and had nothing to
do with the curvilinear lateral measurement of the visor lens itself (as
has been sometimes assumed). The correct visor size for a wearer was
established with a ruler, after the correct mask had been fitted to the
helmet. The visor mounting bar assembly was referred to in official T.O.
references as the visor "yoke".] Other small changes
that were incorporated into all the P-helmets at various times in the
early to mid 50s included replacement of the original riveted chin-strap
with a slightly modified one, addition of a chamois-covered,
wool-cushioned pad to the helmet's chin-strap, replacement of the leather
oxygen mask attachment tabs with ones that made the snaps more accessible,
and introduction of a slightly newer head-harness sling. Overall, however,
the P-1A through P-3 helmets were virtually identical for the most part
and only the new rigid external visor distinguished the P-1 series from
the P-3 series helmet, for all practical purposes. All the early P-series
helmets including the P-1 through the P-3 helmets used the HS-33, HS-38,
and HS-38A communications headset assemblies (AN-AIC-1), with
characteristic chamois-covered, kapok-filled earphone cushions. The next
major upgrade would come about with the introduction of the Type P-4
Flying Helmet specification in late 1955. [Of interest is the fact that
chin straps found on early versions of the P-1A helmet—especially
original P-1 helmets upgraded to P-1A standards--included olive drab
cotton duck variants, as well as the white cotton duck straps that are
more common.] The
type P-4 flying helmet
In 1955, all P-series
helmets were officially upgraded to the new P-4 type specification, which
called for the replacement of earlier headsets with the H-75B/AIC
assembly. An earlier P-3 helmet, thus updated, became designated as a Type
P-4 Flying Helmet. P-4 helmets, newly assembled were delivered directly
from production runs with the new headset assembly. The P-4 helmet still
featured, however, the early original heat/pressure molded phenolic resin
saturated cotton duck shell. As before, the new headset used a rear
exiting 'pigtail' communications cord, but the com connector was
designated Type U-93A/U. Also, in keeping with the earlier P-1A/P-1B
system, the P-4 helmet was made in two sizes (small and large) only. A
type JJ-055 microphone connector was an important feature of the new
headset specification, the adoption of which required use of a slightly
larger rubber 'boot' that was stitched to the left rear area of the helmet
shell to replace the older connector and boot (this is simple way of
determining at a quick glance whether an early P-series helmet has been TO
upgraded to later P-4 type specifications; an original HS-38 type mic
connector would feature the smaller elongated "U" type rubber
connector boot for the earlier JJ-048 connector). At about this time
(1954-55), due to all the TO changes that appear to have been introduced
to the P-series helmets, an already somewhat confused type designation
system becomes slightly more so. Another change resulted in P-1A/P-1B
helmets used without the side-latch visor assembly being re-designated the
MB-4 helmet. It is important to note that the MB-4 configuration (which
was otherwise identical to the P-4, except that it lacked the rigid
external visor) was apparently
intended for use in non-high performance aircraft, such as slower,
multi-crewed bombers, transports, and utility aircraft, in which the extra
protection of a wind-blast visor was not needed and in which the
protruding mechanism itself might pose needless range-of-motion
encumbrances on a crew flight deck or within a flight station. Here, the
confusion increases further, as the external visor assembly was frequently
added to the MB-4 designated helmets arising from individual pilot
preference, although the rigid
wind-blast visor was not standard to the MB-4 specification. Thus,
surviving specimens of both the MB-4 and the P-4 can both be found today
with the visor assembly installed...a situation which has created some
consternation on the part of helmet collectors, flightgear archeologists,
and life support historians. However, despite this apparent incongruity,
the MB-4 and P-4 helmets were given mutually distinct PNs and other
identifying nomenclatural numbers, according to the TOs. TO 14P3-4-508
dated 11 Jul 55 specifies that "...any
P-1A/P-1B helmet updated with the newer H-75/AIC headset system (and
lacking the visor) will be designated as Helmet, Flying, Type MB-4",
whereas "...any P-3 updated to
the (new communications) specification will be thereafter designated as
Helmet, Flying Type P-4". One final observation here is
of interest. The TO also specified that any helmet thus modified or
updated would have the original helmet shell identification tag covered
with a new, self adhering tag identifying the assembly by its updated
type. Although some helmets modified accordingly will still have this
added tag in place, in some cases it has been removed by collectors
interested in learning what the original shell label specified.
(Unfortunately, the label has not been placed back on the shell in
compliance with the strictest spirit of authenticity, in many cases.) Thus, all the early
P-series helmets including the basic rigid helmet and suspension systems
of the P-1, P-1A/P-1B, P-3, P-4, and MB-4, were essentially identical to
each other, with only small, technical differences in communications
assemblies, subcomponent items, visors, and accessory parts variations. A
P-1A or B helmet with the new side-latching rigid visor added became a P-3
helmet; a P-3 to which the new com system had been installed became a P-4.
The
type P-4A flying helmet
T.O. 14P3-4-1 dated
30 Apr 57 states that “…with the exception of the new center-track
actuated rigid external visor, type MB-4 and type P-4A helmets are
identical” (although the MB-4 sometimes had the visor added by bomber
crews that used them, as before). Further improvements to newly
manufactured P-4A helmets included the incorporation of ensolite type
sponge pads lining the internal surface of the new fiberglass shell at
front, rear, and crown (replacing the original, older open-celled sponge
rubber used in early P-series helmets). As before, the headset used
remained either the H-75A/AIC or H-75B/AIC specification, but the
communications “pigtail” ended in the U-93A connector (similar to the
U-93). A further additional change that was instituted with introduction
of the new P-4A TO specification was inclusion of an additional shell
size: Extra-Large. The USAF PNs for the P-4A shells were as follows:
Helmet, Flying, Type P-4A, Small, PN 56D3508-1; Helmet, Flying, Type P-4A,
Large, PN 56D3508-2; Helmet, Flying, Type P-4A, Extra-Large, PN 56D3508-3.
MB-4 helmets were, of course, originally P-1A/P-1Bs, and their PNs were:
Helmet, Flying, Type MB-4, Small, PN 54D3733-1, and Helmet, Flying, Type
MB-4, Large, PN 54D3733-2. Visors for the three P-4A shell sizes were:
Visor, Small, PN 51D3643-3; Visor, Medium, PN 51D3643-2; and Visor, Large,
PN 51D3643-1. In simple summary, P-4 helmets to which the new center-track
visor system was added became P-4A specification. The
type P-4B flying helmet
While older P-4A
helmets were updated in the field to the new P-4B specs, newly
manufactured stock featured all of these refinements directly from the
factory run. The external rigid visor was unchanged from that used on the
P-4A. Newly manufactured P-4B helmets had no rubber plug-filled circular
orifice at the rear of the shell (where a former com cord pigtail exited);
older P-4A helmets that had been updated by squadron personal
equipment/life support techs to P-4B specs featured a black rubber plug in
this area. As before, the JJ-055 mic connector jack (outlet on pilot’s
left) was used in the helmet earphone loom. The early H-149/AIC
headset, originally used with the late model P-helmets (B) and with the
first of the HGU-2/P helmets that replaced the P-series, was used with the
new CX-4707/AIC series oxygen mask hose routed communications cords (these
last specification cords are still in use today in slightly updated
configurations). [It is not altogether uncommon to find that a P-4A
specification helmet was occasionally ‘created’ simply by cutting and
removing the ‘pigtail’ communications cord, a modification which
resulted in the functional equivalent of the new P-4B wiring loom!] Notes on the P-series
visors
The
P-series first, second, and third model visors.
[One final
observation is salient here. The original ‘side-latch non-J-hook’
visors featured a curious circular perforation pattern in the external
yoke bow. This may be clearly seen in some of the earliest images shown in
Air Force technical publications. The reason for this unique pattern of
holes in the outer visor yoke is still unknown at this time, but
subsequent to this appearance, the later yoke bows on all P-helmets are
noted to all have been uniformly constructed of smooth metal (aluminum). The
P-series 4th model visor
|